Benefit incidence of unemployment benefits and ALMP to poorest quintile (% of total U/ALMP benefits) - Country Ranking

Definition: Benefit incidence of unemployment benefits and active labor market programs (ALMP) to poorest quintile shows the percentage of total unemployment and active labor market programs benefits received by the poorest 20% of the population. Unemployment benefits and active labor market programs include unemployment compensation, severance pay, and early retirement due to labor market reasons, labor market services (intermediation), training (vocational, life skills, and cash for training), job rotation and job sharing, employment incentives and wage subsidies, supported employment and rehabilitation, and employment measures for the disabled. Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.

Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, The World Bank. Data are based on national representative household surveys. (datatopics.worldbank.org/aspire/)

See also: Thematic map, Time series comparison

Find indicator:
Rank Country Value Year
1 Russia 43.61 2017
2 Hungary 39.21 2007
3 Belarus 28.32 2016
4 Kazakhstan 28.21 2014
5 Bosnia and Herzegovina 28.20 2007
6 Poland 25.78 2015
7 Argentina 25.72 2019
8 Albania 25.16 2012
9 Slovak Republic 24.95 2009
10 Cabo Verde 24.80 2007
11 Lithuania 23.97 2008
12 Senegal 23.39 2011
13 Bulgaria 22.94 2007
14 Armenia 21.33 2013
15 Ukraine 21.29 2018
16 Croatia 20.05 2014
17 Serbia 19.86 2015
18 Honduras 18.47 2011
19 Iraq 18.14 2006
20 Uruguay 17.63 2019
21 Latvia 17.50 2009
22 Bangladesh 17.45 2010
23 Romania 16.32 2016
24 Botswana 15.75 2015
25 Liberia 11.94 2016
26 Montenegro 8.20 2014
27 Turkey 7.84 2019
28 Comoros 6.91 2004
29 Georgia 6.31 2011
30 Brazil 5.28 2019
31 Chile 4.40 2017
32 Mauritius 3.85 2017
33 South Africa 2.73 2005
34 Rwanda 0.88 2010

More rankings: Africa | Asia | Central America & the Caribbean | Europe | Middle East | North America | Oceania | South America | World |

Limitations and Exceptions: When interpreting ASPIRE performance indicators based on household surveys, it is important to note that the extent to which information on specific transfers and programs is captured in the household surveys can vary a lot across countries. Moreover, household surveys do not capture the universe of social protection programs in the country, in best practice cases just the largest programs. As a consequence, ASPIRE indicators are not fully comparable across program categories and countries; however, they provide approximate measures of social protection systems performance. In addition, there may be cases where ASPIRE performance indicators differ from official WB country reports as ASPIRE indicators are based on a first level analysis of original survey data and unified methodology that does not necessarily reflect country-specific knowledge and in depth country analysis relying on administrative program level data and/or imputations.

Aggregation method: Simple average

Periodicity: Annual